STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
DEONDRE LESHAWN POWELL

Fla. 6th DCA | 2023-06-30
No. 2023-0056
Florida District Court of Appeal, Sixth District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case involves a consolidated appeal where the defendant challenged evidentiary rulings, and the State appealed the trial court's imposition of a fifty-year sentence instead of a life sentence for burglary. The appellate court affirmed the evidentiary rulings but reversed the sentence, ordering a life sentence as mandated by statute for a prison releasee reoffender convicted of a life-felony.


Holding

Yes, the trial court erred. The statute mandates a life sentence for a prison releasee reoffender convicted of a life felony, and there is no judicial discretion to impose a lesser sentence.


Headnotes

[1] A defendant convicted of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm, who is also designated a prison releasee reoffender, must be senten…

[2] A trial court lacks discretion to impose a sentence other than life imprisonment when a defendant is convicted of a life-felony and is designated a prison releasee reoffe…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“As to the evidentiary issues raised by Defendant, we find no error and affirm without further discussion. As to the State’s argument regarding the sentence on the conviction of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a life sentence.”

This quote summarizes the court's decision on both the defendant's and the state's appeals.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Deondre L. Powell was convicted of several felonies, including burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm. The State…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

MIZE, J.

In the trial below, Deondre L. Powell (“Defendant”) was convicted of (1) burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm; (2) attempted robbery; (3) aggravated battery; and (4) three counts of aggravated assault.1 In this consolidated appeal, Defendant appeals the trial court’s rulings on the admission of certain evidence. The State appeals the trial court’s imposition of a fifty-year sentence rather than life imprisonment on Defendant’s conviction of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm.

As to the evidentiary issues raised by Defendant, we find no error and affirm without further discussion. As to the State’s argument regarding the sentence on the conviction of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a life sentence.

Pursuant to section 775.082(9)(a)1., Florida Statutes (2019), a “prison releasee reoffender” includes “any defendant who commits, or attempts to commit,” one of certain enumerated felonies “within 3 years after being released from a state correctional facility operated by the Department of Corrections…following incarceration for an offense for which the sentence is punishable by more than1 year in this state.” “If the state attorney determines that a defendant is a prison releasee reoffender…, the state attorney may seek to have the court sentence the defendant as a prison releasee reoffender.” § 775.082(9)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2019). “Upon proof from the state attorney that establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant is a prison releasee reoffender…, such defendant is not eligible for sentencing under the sentencing guidelines and must be sentenced” as set forth in the statute. Id. For a felony punishable by life, the statute requires a life sentence. § 775.082(9)(a)3.a., Fla. Stat. (2019).

Burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm is one of the enumerated felonies for which a defendant may be designated a prison releasee reoffender and it is also a felony punishable by life. In the proceedings below, the State sought to have the trial court designate Defendant as a prison releasee reoffender, which the trial court did. Once Defendant was convicted of a felony punishable by life and designated as a prison releasee reoffender, section 775.082(9)(a)3.a mandated that the trial court impose a life sentence. See also Willingham v. State, 315 So. 3d 708, 712–13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (holding that, under the plain language of the statute, “the trial court was therefore required to sentence the defendant to life imprisonment” and “there is no judicial discretion to impose a different sentence”).

In his Answer Brief to the State’s appeal, Defendant does not contest that the trial court was required to sentence him to life imprisonment.

Defendant argues, however, that we should nevertheless affirm his sentence because, given Defendant’s age, a sentence of fifty years is the functional equivalent of a life sentence.

Section 775.082(9)(a)3.a required the trial court to sentence Defendant to “a term of imprisonment for life,” not the functional equivalent thereof.

Accordingly,

we reverse the sentence on the conviction of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm and remand this case to the trial court with instructions to enter a life sentence on this conviction. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.

TRAVER, C.J., and SMITH, J., concur. Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Footnotes
1 This case was transferred from the Second District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw