MAYLIN MASO
v.
SECURITY FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY D/B/A SECURITY FIRST FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's dismissal of the appellant's complaint was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the court's decision in Hughes v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
[1] A trial court's dismissal of an insurance complaint must be evaluated in light of controlling appellate precedent regarding the substantive legal standards applicable to…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMaylin Maso filed a complaint against Security First Insurance Company d/b/a Security First Florida. The trial court dismissed the complaint.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certification Of Conflict cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-1315 Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CA-008420-O _____________________________ MAYLIN MASO, Appellant, v. SECURITY FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a SECURITY FIRST FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Kevin B. Weiss, Judge. December 15, 2023 PER CURIAM. We reverse the trial court’s final order dismissing Appellant's complaint and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Hughes v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co., No. 6D23-296, 2023 WL 8108671 (Fla. 6th DCA Nov. 22, 2023).1 Also consistent with Hughes, we certify conflict with Cole
2 v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 363 So. 3d 1089 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023). REVERSED and REMANDED. STARGEL, NARDELLA and GANNAM, JJ., concur. Kenneth R. Duboff, of Duboff Law Firm, North Miami, for Appellant. C. DeWitt Revels, III, and Celeste Murphy-Gerling, of Walker, Revels, Greninger, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED