J. S. G.
v.
J. A. R. AND R. R.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
J.S.G. appealed two rulings in a paternity action and challenged a final judgment of dissolution in a separate action to which he was not a party. The court dismissed the appeal as to the dissolution judgment and affirmed the rulings in the paternity action.
The court dismissed the appeal insofar as it challenged the final judgment of dissolution because J.S.G. lacked standing as he was not a party to that action. The court affirmed the two rulings in the paternity action.
“We dismiss the appeal insofar as it challenges the final judgment of dissolution.”
The court's holding that J.S.G. lacked standing to appeal a judgment in an action to which he was not a party
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJ.S.G. was involved in a consolidated appeal challenging two rulings in his paternity action. Additionally, he sought to challenge a final judgment of…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Paternity Action cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Case Nos. 6D2023-0077, 6D23-2670, and 6D23-2859 CONSOLIDATED Lower Tribunal Nos. 18-DR-003109 and 18-DR-000618
J.S.G., Appellant,
V.
J.A.R. and R.R., Appellees.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County. Lisa S. Porter, Judge.
February 14, 2025
PER CURIAM.
In this consolidated appeal, J.S.G. challenges two rulings in his paternity action and a final judgment of dissolution in a separate action, to which he was not a party. ¹
We dismiss the appeal insofar as it challenges the final judgment of dissolution. YHT & Assocs., Inc. v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, 177 So. 3d 641, 643– 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). We affirm in all other respects.
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
NARDELLA, WHITE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur. Nancy A. Hass, of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Hollywood, and Stacy L. Haverfield, of Stacy L. Haverfield, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellees.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED [FOOTNOTE 1] This case was transferred from the Second District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- YHT & Assocs., Inc. v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, 177 So. 3d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)