BENJAMIN DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BENJAMIN DAVIS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
567 So. 2d 544
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The only point raised in this appeal concerns the propriety of the award of fees for services of the public defender appointed to represent appellant at trial. These were awarded without notice and hence are set aside without prejudice to seek reimposition after proper notice and opportunity to be heard.
Attorney’s fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.
THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hampton, 692 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…pinion from this court, State v. Bare, 473 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Other district courts are in agreement with Bare. See, e.g., O’Malley v. Mounts, 590 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), rev. denied, 595 So. 2d 557 (Fla.1992); State v. Guthrie, 567 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Franklin v. State, 505 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); State v. Chacon, 479 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), disapproved on other grounds in State v. Fields, 505 So. 2d 1336 (Fla.1987). We agree with the state. In Wells the issue…
-
State v. Perez, 72 So. 3d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…recognized that a more specific statute controls over a more general statute. Telesz, 873 So. 2d at 1237-38 (holding that section 812.035(10) takes precedent over section 775.15 in theft cases and citing collection of authorities); State v. Guthrie, 567 So. 2d 544, 545 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (rejecting argument that section 775.15 tolling provision applies to the more specific provision in section 812.035(10) and noting that the latter statute specified that its statute of limitations controls “notwithstanding an…
-
Donnie Ray Williams v. State, 707 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…Section 775.15(6), Florida Statutes (1989), which provides that the limitations period may be tolled if the defendant is continually absent from the state, does not apply to this case because the crime charged was grand theft. See State v. Guthrie, 567 So. 2d 544, 545 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Section 812.035(10), Florida Statutes, the grand theft statute of limitations, was amended in 1992 to add a similar tolling provision. But that provision does not apply to crimes committed in 1989. See Arnold v. State, 689 S…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence