DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLANT,

v.

DORIS B. CANTAVE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Skaggs v. State, 620 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
  …ordered as part of her sentence. The restitution order was entered more than sixty days after sentencing. We find no error in the two evidentiary issues raised. See Buchman v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 381 So. 2d 229, 230 (Fla.1980); Haas v. State, 567 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), approved, 597 So. 2d 770 (Fla.1992). We do, however, find that the trial court was without jurisdiction to order restitution and thus reverse on that issue alone. At the sentencing hearing held in July 1992 the state atto…
• Haas v. State, 597 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1992)
  …GRIMES, Justice. We review Haas v. State, 567 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), in which the court certified to be of great public importance the question of whether a blood-alcohol level test result must be related back to the time of the offense in order to convict of driving under the influence (DUI) in…
• Nelson v. State, 725 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …ermine whether the evidence was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. Law; Penn v. State, 574 So. 2d 1079 (Fla.1991); Evans v. State, 692 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Haas v. State, 567 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), aff'd, 597 So. 2d 770 (Fla.1992). The jury could properly find Nelson’s hypothesis unreasonable, says the state, in view of the extensive blood stain on his clothing, the location of the body by the door rather than on the sofa,…