JAMES ROBERT ROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
SAMUEL JAMES THORPE; GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, JOSE A. BROWN, GRACIELA BROWN AND UNISTRUT CORP., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-10-16
No. 90-1058
Before HUBBART, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
567 So. 2d 1075 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment in favor of appellee, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, based upon the authority of Kraemer v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, 556 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), jurisdiction accepted, 564 So. 2d 487 (Fla.1990) and Raynor v. De La Nuez, 558 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Likewise, as in Raynor, 558 So. 2d at 141, because the question raised by appellant, James Robert Rooks, “affects the rights of the motoring public,” we certify our decision to the Florida Supreme Court as one involving great public importance.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Parvin Wright v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 570 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …PER CURIAM. We affirm the summary final judgment in favor of appellee General Motors Acceptance Corporation under the authority of Rooks v. Thorpe, 567 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Tsiknakis v. Volvo Finance North America, Inc., 566 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Raynor v. De La Nuez, 558 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Folmar v. Young, 560 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Kraemer v. General Motors Acceptance…
  • Rooks v. Thorpe, 578 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1991)
    …PER CURIAM. We have for review Rooks v. Thorpe, 567 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), which certified its decision to this Court as one of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw