RANDALE L. COLE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Robbie v. Dwyn Daniels Robbie, 726 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …improvidently permitted the instant appeal of a contempt order to proceed as a direct appeal. We now redesignate it as an appeal from a non-final order. See Langbert v. Langbert, 409 So. 2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); see also Badger v. Badger, 568 So. 2d 79, 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). . "Bridge-the-gap” alimony is intended to smooth the transition between a higher standard of marital living and the standard that a spouse can provide for herself, and is typically for a very short period of time, such as i…
• Ric Hollifield v. Renew & Co., Inc., 18 So. 3d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …final order such as that at issue here. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b); see Hialeah Hotel, Inc. v. Woods, 778 So. 2d 314, 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (explaining that “Rule 1.540 applies only to final judgments, not to interlocutory orders”); Badger v. Badger, 568 So. 2d 79, 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“We commence by pointing out that the order ... holding the husband in contempt was a non-final order. That being the case, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) was not available to the husband, since that rule may be di…
• Kozich v. DeBRINO, 837 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …o. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). We affirm the denial of Kozich’s motion for relief from the temporary injunction pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). That rule provides no basis for relief from a non-final order. See Badger v. Badger, 568 So. 2d 79, 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The proper method of obtaining relief from such an order is through a motion to dissolve the injunction. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610(d). We reverse the order dismissing the counterclaim with prejudice against IFIC and affirm…