SARAH ELIZABETH COCHRAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 6th DCA | 2025-08-12
No. 2024-1119
411 So. 3d 1278 Florida District Court of Appeal, Sixth District (2025) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, WHITE and MIZE, JJ., concur. Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Caroline Joan S. Picart, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Medrano-Chavez v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)
  • Sasser v. Joleen Sasser (Fla. 6th DCA 2026)
    …ng on the admissibility of evidence is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard." Morris v. State, 233 So. 3d 438, 446 (Fla. 2018) (citation omitted). However, the trial court's discretion is limited by the rules of evidence. Cochran v. State, 411 So. 3d 1278, 1280 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (citing Hudson v. State, 992 So. 2d 96, 107 (Fla. 2008)). “The standard of review applicable to the trial court's factual findings is whether they are supported by competent, substantial evidence." Reimbursement Recovery, I…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw