MICHAEL A. BARFIELD, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1990-10-11
No. 90-313
SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
568 So. 2d 493 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the agency lacked jurisdiction to enter an order after an appeal was filed, and that order is therefore quashed.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought a formal hearing from an administrative agency, which was initially denied. The agency later vacated its order and granted the hearin…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Michael A. Barfield appeals an order of the Department of State, Division of Licensing, which imposed an administrative fine. He argues that the agency improperly denied his request for a formal hearing pursuant to section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

The agency has now entered an order dated August 22, 1990, which vacated its earlier order and granted appellant the formal hearing he requested. The department moves for dismissal of this appeal, essentially contending the issues presented here are moot. Appellant has responded, stating no opposition to dismissal so long as his right to move for award of attorney’s fees and costs is preserved.

We find the agency lacked jurisdiction to enter the order of August 22 because of the pendency of this appeal, and the order is therefore quashed. We elect to treat the appellee’s motion as in the nature of a confession of error, and reverse and remand this cause for proceedings consistent with the Florida Administrative Procedure Act. Pure Fresh Enterprises, Inc. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, 519 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Sierra Club Committee on Political Education Florida Fund v. Florida Elections Commission, Department of State, 507 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Appellant may apply to the lower tribunal for an award of costs. He has not, however, stated any cognizable grounds for an award of attorney’s fees.

REVERSED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …rror and reverse the circuit court’s order. By previous order, we agreed with the homeowners’ response, and indicated we would treat the insurer’s motion to dismiss as a confession of error. See, e.g., Barfield v. Dep’t of State, Div. of Licensing, 568 So. 2d 493, 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (where, after the appellant’s appeal, the appellee agreed to the appellant’s requested relief, and the appellee then filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot, the appellate court elected to 2 treat the appellee’s motio…
  • Gonzalez v. State (11th Cir. Ct. App. Div. 2020)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw