TENECA HINES
v.
DEBORAH GILL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant who fails to comply with a court order to present an adequate record for review cannot obtain reversal of the trial court's judgment.
“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
Court citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
Appellant Teneca Hines appealed a decision by the trial court against appellee Deborah Gill. Appellant failed to comply with the appellate court's Jan…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review Standards cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Because Appellant failed to comply with this Court's Order dated January 29, 2026, and present an adequate record for review, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1052 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
AFFIRMED.
BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Teneca Hines, pro se, Appellant.
Deborah Gill, pro se, Appellee.