TENECA HINES
v.
PLEASANA DAVISON
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court must affirm the trial court's judgment when the appellant fails to provide an adequate record of trial proceedings necessary for appellate review.
“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
Court's rationale for affirming based on inadequate record
Appellant Teneca Hines appealed from a trial court judgment against her. The appellant failed to comply with the First District Court of Appeal's Janu…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Because Appellant failed to comply with this Court's Order dated January 29, 2026, and present an adequate record for review, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1052 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
AFFIRMED.
BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Teneca Hines, pro se, Appellant.
Pleasana Davison, pro se, Appellee.