ANTHONY MARSHALL
v.
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant's failure to present developed arguments in the appellate brief, rather than merely referencing arguments made below, results in waiver of those claims.
“The purpose of an appellate brief is to present arguments in support of the points on appeal. Merely making reference to arguments below without further elucidation does not suffice to preserve issues, and these claims are deemed to have been waived.”
Duest v. Dugger, 555 So. 2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1990), cited to support the waiver standard
Anthony Marshall appealed a circuit court judgment in favor of Wilmington Savings Fund Society. The case involved a financial dispute in Broward Count…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Waiver Of Issues cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carlos A. Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062022CA011945AXXXCE.
Anthony Marshall, Eatonville, pro se.
Sean K. Mills of MBK Chapman PC, Orlando, for appellee Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); see also Duest v. Dugger, 555 So. 2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1990) ("The purpose of an appellate brief is to present arguments in support of the points on appeal. Merely making reference to arguments below without further elucidation does not suffice to preserve issues, and these claims are deemed to have been waived.”).
LEVINE, FORST and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.