LAYFIELD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2026-03-19
No. 2026-0585
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The petition was dismissed.

Facts & Procedural History

Mathew Randall Layfield, acting pro se, filed a petition with the Florida District Court of Appeal, First District.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Motion Practice Petition For Writ Of Prohibition Pro Se Representation Appellate Procedure

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion Practice cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and BILBREY and ROWE, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Mathew Randall Layfield, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw