SMITH

v.

DWYER

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• Anderson v. The Bd. of Pub. Instruction for the Cnty. of Hillsborough, 102 Fla. 695 (Fla. 1931)
  …cular county or locality intended to be affected by it is in terms named or identified in the Act or not. See Jordan v. State ex rel. Davis, 129 So. 747, 100 Fla. 494; Stripling v. Thomas, 132 So. 824, 101 Fla. 1015; Whitney vs. Hillsborough County, 127 So. 486, 99 Fla. 628. . In this case the bill of complaint alleges, the answer admits and this Court judicially knows that Hills-borough County is the only county which, according to the last State or Federal census, had a population of not less than 145,0…
• State v. Harris, 120 Fla. 555 (Fla. 1934)
  …r a decrease in their population respectively. In the latter case there was' an intermediate classification not appropriate to the subject regulated. See also Stripling v. Thomas, 101 Fla. 1015, 132 So. 824; Whitney v. Hillsborough Co., 99 Fla. 628, 127 So. 486; Anderson v. Board, 102 Fla. 695, 136 So. 334; Knight v. Board, 102 Fla. 923, 136 So. 631. In the larger counties of the State, the various and onerous duties of the county commissioners' or other considerations may in the judgment of the Legislatu…
• Webb v. Scott, 129 Fla. 111 (Fla. 1936)
  …attempting to regulate the powers and duties of the County Commissioners in violation of Article III, Section 20, of the Constitution, Chapter 10145 is a special Act applying only to Hillsborough County. Whitney v. Hillsborough County, 99 Fla. 628, 127 So. 486. But the Act does not attempt to regulate the powers and duties of the County Commissioners. These powers and duties are provided for by general law. This statute provides for a method of making local improvements outside the limits of municipalitie…

  ← 1 / 2 →