FELLOWS CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
BETTY VARIANCE, APPELLEE
FELLOWS CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
BETTY VARIANCE, APPELLEE
568 So. 2d 934
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Fellows Corporation, appeals a non-final order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. We have considered the record presented to the trial court and here, and find no error demonstrated therein.
Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed.
DOWNEY, DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Carter, 654 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…ires that such a modification occur only after the filing of a motion seeking modification and notice to the other party. Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So. 2d 334 (Fla.1957); Notarianni v. Notarianni, 622 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Burgess v. Burgess, 568 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), review denied, 581 So. 2d 1307 (Fla.1991). Accordingly, we reverse the order. On remand the trial court is directed to reinstate the support obligations due under the Ohio order and recalculate the arrearage to include this amoun…
-
Torres v. Torres, 739 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…der these circumstances. We agree. It is settled that a trial court cannot modify a child support obligation absent a pleading or motion requesting such modification. Notarianni v. Notarianni, 622 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Burgess v. Burgess, 568 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Raybuck v. Raybuck, 451 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). A final judgment of dissolution, such as has been present in the circumstances of this case since 1992, establishes the obligations of each party regarding child support unti…