COMMERCIAL CREDIT CO.
v.
PARKER
Commercial Credit Company, Inc., Plaintiff in Error, v. W. M. Parker, Defendant in Error. Opinion filed February 17, 1931.
Petition for rehearing denied March 6, 1931. Altmcm, Morrow & Cooper, for Plaintiff in Error; Peterson, Carver, Lcmgston <& O’Qum, for Defendant in Error.
Per Curiam.
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the court below be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the cause is remanded with directions that a new trial be had. Strum, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
Mrs. Eunice E. Orr v. Avon Fla. Citrus Corp., 130 Fla. 306 (Fla. 1937)…if it consists of mysterious or unexplained circumstances, these should be resolved by a jury rather than the court. City Grocery Co. v. Cothron, 117 Fla. 322, 157 So. 891; Starks v. Sawyer, 56 Fla. 596, 47 So. 513; Commercial Credit Co. v. Parker, 101 Fla. 928, 132 So. 640; Harbeson Lumber Co. v. Cosson, 116 Fla. 495, 106 So. 482. The question of negligence is always a jury question to be answered from the facts and circumstances adduced at the trial. If the negligence is charged to the agent or servant…
-
Boole v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 147 Fla. 589 (Fla. 1941)…assumed to be not serious. See 53 C. J. 1212; 23 R. C. L. 391. “Where there is some substantial evidence tending to prove the issue for the plaintiff, a verdict should not be directed for defendant.” Commercial Credit Co. v. Parker, 101 Fla. 928, 132 So. 640; Cason v. Fla. Power Co., 74 Fla. 1, 76 So. 535, L. R. A. 1918A, 1034; Fla. Cent. & P. R. Co. v. Williams, 37 Fla. 406, 20 So. 558; Gravette v. Turner, 77 Fla. 311, 81 So. 476. Instead of directing a verdict for the defendant the cause should…
-
Marion Mortgate Co. v. Grennan, 106 Fla. 913 (Fla. 1932)…ne misleads the other, he who is the cause or occasion of that condition by which the loss has been caused or occasioned ought to bear it. Skivesen v. Brown et al., 101 Fla. 1384, 133 So. 564; Commerce Credit Company vs. [*924] Parker, 101 Fla. 928, 132 So. 640; Continental Jewelry-Company v. Weilbacker (La.) 136 So. 110; American Process Co. vs. White Pressed Brick Co., 58 Fla. 116, 47 So. 942, 16 Ann. Cas. 1054. See also 10 R. C. L., pages 695 and 697, sections 23 and 25. It is also a well recognized rul…
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence