BOYD

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Thomas v. State, 914 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …affirm the summary denial of his claim of vindictive sentencing. See Baker v. State, 904 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Benedetto v. State, 895 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citing Boyd v. State, 880 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review denied, 888 So. 2d 621 (Fla.2004)). We also affirm the summary denial of his claim of illegal sentencing under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We have held previously that the decision does not apply retroactively. See McBrid…
• Bouno v. State, 900 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …. The trial court denied the motion as not being cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We agree and affirm.1 Reese v. State, 896 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review denied, 888 So. 2d 621 (Fla.2004). In concluding as we have, we have not overlooked our recent opinion in Johnson v. State, 877 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), wherein we remanded for further consideration a similar claim made pursuant to rule 3.800(a). A review of this…
• Williams v. State, 913 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 2005)
  …writs authority, and no such basis is apparent on the face of the petitions. C. Conclusion In the past, the Court has dismissed Bedford claims such as these by unpublished order. See, e.g., Floyd v. State, 888 So. 2d 622 (Fla.2004); Bell v. State, 888 So. 2d 621 (Fla.2004); Schultz v. State, 884 So. 2d 24 (Fla.2004). The present opinion is written “merely to clarify, for the benefit of the public and the Bar, this Court’s conclusion that it does not have jurisdiction in such cases.” Gandy v. State, 846 So.…