BARNES

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2007)
  …tified conflict with Wilson v. State, 913 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), which applied the “would-have-been-imposed” standard. Id. We have jurisdiction to resolve the conflict and granted review. See art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.; Brooks v. State, 948 So. 2d 758 (Fla.2007) (granting review). We agree with the Fourth District. Below, we first review our decision in Anderson. Next, we discuss the facts of this case and the conflict in the district courts. Finally, we analyze and resolve the conflict by holdi…
• Chames v. DeMAYO, 972 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2007)
  …certified a question of great public importance. Id. Both parties sought review in this Court, and we accepted jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.; Chames v. DeMayo, 937 So. 2d 122 (Fla.2006) (accepting jurisdiction); DeMayo v. Chames, 948 So. 2d 758 (Fla.2007) (accepting jurisdiction). We rephrase the question as follows: Should this Court recede from longstanding precedent holding that the Florida Constitution’s exemption from forced sale of a homestead cannot be waived? For reasons we explain…
• Shana Barnes v. State, 970 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 2007)
  …t District on the basis that it expressly and directly conflicts with the decisions in Young v. State, 645 So. 2d 965 (Fla.1994), and Janson v. State, 730 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), review denied, 767 So. 2d 457 (Fla.2000). See Barnes v. State, 948 So. 2d 758 (Fla.2007) (table). In Young, this Court held that trial testimony presented through videotape to a jury should not also be permitted in the jury room as an exhibit, and further that videotaped out-of-court interviews with child victims are not allo…