STATE

v.

CABLE

Citator

Cited By

• Punsky v. Clay Cnty. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs & Scibal Assocs., 60 So. 3d 1088 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …ffirming the finding that the employer and carrier had rebutted the presumption of compensability found in section 112.18(1), Florida Statutes (2004), and certifying a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court), review denied, 22 So. 3d 539 (Fla.2009). Thereafter, the employer and carrier, as the prevailing parties, filed a motion pursuant to section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes (2004), seeking to tax costs, representing that they had incurred $10,622.87 in defending against claimant’s…
• State v. Brown, 36 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …reasoning on the point6 and because we are required to do so by Article 1, section 12,7 of the Florida Constitution. See State [*776] v. Betz, 815 So. 2d 627, 631 (Fla.2002). Contra Cable v. State, 18 So. 3d 37, 39-40 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 22 So. 3d 539 (Fla.2009) (certifying question). V The order under review is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for denial of the motion to suppress. . Numerous cases establish the application of this exception. See United States v. Santa, 236 F. 3d 662…
• State of Fla. Dep't OF Corr. v. Junod, 217 So. 3d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
  …and convincing evidence to rebut the presumption. Punsky v. Clay Cty. Sheriffs Office, 18 So. 3d 577, 584 (Fla. 1st DCA) (On Rehearing En Banc) (certifying question of great public. importance as to the E/C’s proper burden of proof), review denied, 22 So. 3d 539 (Fla. 2009). The E/C’s rebuttal evidence must be medical evidence established to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. Fuller v. Okaloosa Corr. Inst., 22 So. 3d 803, 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). If the JCC’s ultimate conclusion is not supported by c…