STATE
v.
ANDERSON
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Per Curiam Opinion cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant was convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. The only bill of exceptions in the record is one that was reserved to the overruling of a motion for a new trial; the allegation being that there was not sufficient evidence to justify the conviction. The defendant set forth in his motion for a new trial the proof which he alleged was adduced and that which he alleged was lacking; and he contends now that the allegations made in his motion were not denied by the district judge, and therefore must be accepted as true. The allegations made in the motion for a new trial were not set forth as facts in the bill of exceptions, and are in effect denied by the judge in the per curiam, where he says that the evidence convinced him beyond any doubt of the defendant's guilt. There is therefore no question of law to be considered.
The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mason W. Alger v. Peters, 88 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 1956)…are separable, and the decree may be made without affecting the interest of those not present, the case may be decided on its merits as between those who are regularly before the court. 20 R.C.L. 703, § 44. See, also, Johnson v. Benbow, 93 Fla. 124, 111 So. 504; Mountein v. King, 75 Fla. 12, 77 So. 630.” See also Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. 129, 15 L.Ed. 158; and Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 3, Sec. 19.07. If the record before us indicated that the appellants, regardless of tenancy or their absence from…
-
Milton v. City of Marianna, 107 Fla. 251 (Fla. 1932)…le and the decree [*257] may be made without affecting the interest of those not present the case may be decided on its merits as between those who are regularly before the court. 20 R. C. L. 703, Section 44. See also Johnson v. Benbow, 93 Fla. 124, 111 So. 504; Mountein v. King, 75 Fla. 12, 77 So. 630. In this connection it will be observed that Section 15 of the General Acts of 1929 (chapter 14572) provides that in the foreclosure of state and county taxes that as many certificates may be included in on…
-
Dixon v. City of Cocoa, 106 Fla. 855 (Fla. 1932)…h such surveys or descriptions as recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court, or by reference to deed of record, giving the book and page as appears in the office of the clerk of the circuit court.” See Johnson v. Benbow, 93 Fla. 324, 111 South. Rep. 504. The assessment is invalid because of insufficiency of the description. Gruson v. Furman, 22 Fla. 581; Miller v. Lundstrum, 45 Fla. 473, 33 South. Rep. 521; Porter v. Key West, 69 Fla. 357, 69 South. Rep. 175; F. E. C. Ry. Co. v. Mitchell, 80 Fla.…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence