LOGSDON

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Bland v. Health Care & Ret. Corp. OF Am., 927 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …So. 2d at 761; Petsch, 872 So. 2d at 264; Rollins, Inc. v. Lighthouse Bay Holdings, Ltd., 898 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA) (noting that arbitrator should in first instance decide validity of remedial restrictions in arbitration provision), review denied, 908 So. 2d 1057 (Fla.2005). Such a determination is well within the arbitrator’s ken. Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardegna, — U.S. -,-, 126 S.Ct. 1204, 1210, 163 L.Ed.2d 1038 (2006) (holding that regardless of whether challenge is brought in federal or state court, ch…
• Lacey v. Healthcare & Ret. Corp. OF Am., 918 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …to substantially affect the compensatory damage remedy. These provisions are thus void under the public policy rationale utilized in this district. But see Rollins, Inc. v. Lighthouse Bay Holdings, Ltd., 898 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), rev. den’d, 908 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 2005); Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Petsch, 872 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). [*335] In VoiceStream Wireless, 912 So. 2d at 34, the trial court found the arbitration agreement unconscionable. The agreement contained a damages limitation,…
• Mitchell v. State, 911 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 2005)
  …ders affecting the financial interests of the State or another governmental body. Mitchell also cites the decision in State v. Ducharme, 881 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), review dismissed, 895 So. 2d 405 (Fla.2005), and review denied, No. SC05-290, 908 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. July 8, 2005), wherein the Fifth District expressed agreement with Judge Padovano’s dissent and his view “that confinement under the Jimmy Ryce Act must rest on something more substantial than the effect of a mechanical rule that goes into eff…