FLORES

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• EY v. State, 982 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2008)
  …d guilty to the first one. Thus, he argued, his was a “real, immediate, and actual consequence faced at the time of the plea that counsel was fully aware of.” We have jurisdiction, see art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., and granted review. Ey v. State, 954 So. 2d 27 (Fla.2007). As we discuss below, we agree with Petitioner that this distinction makes a difference. II. ERRONEOUS ADVICE ABOUT SENTENCING CONSEQUENCES We were first presented with the question certified in this case in Bates v. State, 887 So. 2d 1…
• Eugenia Austin v. State, 968 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …s rejection of a plea offer. See Gomez v. State, 832 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Compare Morgan v. State, 941 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), rev. granted, 956 So. 2d 456 (Fla.2007); Dines v. State, 909 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), rev. dism., 954 So. 2d 27 (Fla.2006); Gonzales v. State, 691 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 700 So. 2d 685 (Fla.1997).…
• Gen. Motors Corp. v. Sanchez, 16 So. 3d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …0); Mary Dee Pridgen, Consumer Protection and the Law, Remedies — Damages and Attorney Fees, § 15:18 (Westlaw, updated through October 2008). The appellee argues that Gelinas v. Forest River, Inc., 931 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), review denied, 954 So. 2d 27 (Fla.2007), requires a different result. The trial court agreed but we don’t. In Gelinas, the court was faced with the manufacturer’s contention that any claim for attorneys’ fees incurred before the arbitration board was required to be presented to…