JIMENEZ

v.

CROSBY

Citator

Cited By

• Larimore v. State, 2 So. 3d 101 (Fla. 2008)
  …) where Larimore’s offense occurred before the effective date of the amendment to section 944.28 authorizing the forfeiture of gaintime upon revocation of probation. Larimore v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 910 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), review denied, 905 So. 2d 125 (Fla.2005). Lari-more then filed a motion to dismiss the state’s commitment petition under the Jimmy Ryce Act, arguing that he was not in lawful custody on the effective date of the Act. After the trial court denied the motion to dismiss, this petit…
• Jimenez v. State, 997 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 2008)
  …preme Court, but all these petitions were denied. See Jimenez v. Fla. Dep't of Corrs., 481 F. 3d 1337 (11th Cir.2007) (denying the certificate of appealability to appeal the federal district court's denial of the habeas petition); Jimenez v. Crosby, 905 So. 2d 125 (Fla.2005) (table) (denying successive habeas petition); Jimenez v. Crosby, 861 So. 2d 429 (Fla.2003) (table) (denying habeas petition that also sought to invoke “All Writs Jurisdiction”); Jimenez v. Florida, 535 U.S. 1064, 122 S.Ct. 1932, 152 L.Ed.…
• Larimore v. State, 917 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …) where Larimore’s offense occurred before the effective date of the amendment to section 944.28 authorizing the forfeiture of gaintime upon revocation of probation. Larimore v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 910 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), review denied, 905 So. 2d 125 (Fla.2005). Larimore then filed a motion to dismiss the state’s commitment petition under the Jimmy Ryce Act, arguing that he was not in lawful custody on the effective date of the Act. After the trial court denied the motion to dismiss, this petiti…