CAUTHAN

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Diansky Rouzard v. State, 952 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …below. There may be records showing that the warnings given here were different from those given in Roberts or that the warnings appellant received were otherwise sufficient. See Canete v. State, 921 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA) (en banc), rev. denied, 944 So. 2d 986 (Fla.2006). If no records refute his allegation that the Miranda warnings were insufficient, the court must determine whether counsel was deficient in failing to raise this issue and whether appellant has shown there is a reasonable probability that…
• Petruny v. State, 958 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …DCA 2004); Ethridge v. State, 766 So. 2d 413, 414 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The record before this court does not reveal that comparable and sufficient warnings were given. Compare Canete v. State, 921 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA) (en banc), rev. denied, 944 So. 2d 986 (Fla.2006). If no records are available to refute Petruny’s claim, the trial court on remand must determine whether Petruny has shown there is a reasonable probability that, “but for counsel’s failure to inform him of the deficiency in the warnings…
• State v. Allstar Bail Bonds, 983 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
  …ntract. Impossibility of Performance The courts have consistently held that a bail bond is a three-party contract between the state, the accused, and the surety. Curlycan Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State, 933 So. 2d 122, 123 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 944 So. 2d 986 (Fla.2006); Allegheny Cas. Co. v. State, 850 So. 2d 669, 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Pinellas County v. Robertson, 490 So. 2d 1041, 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Accredited Sur. & Cas. Co. v. State ex rel. Hillsborough County, 383 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 19…