FERDINANDO

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Dep't OF Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Bogorff, 35 So. 3d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …0 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), rev. granted, 842 So. 2d 844 (Fla.2003); (4) Haire v. Fla. Dept. of Agric. & Consumer Servs., 870 So. 2d 774 (Fla.2004); and (5) Fla. Dept. of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Cox, 947 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), rev. denied, 962 So. 2d 336 (Fla.2007). . New Nautical Coatings Inc. v. Scoggin, 731 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Broward County, 665 So. 2d 272, 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); NCNB Nat’l Bank of Fla. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 477 So. 2d 579, 583 (Fla.…
• Stander v. Dispoz-O-Products, Inc., 973 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …, by failing to seek leave from the trial court to amend the complaint, plaintiff is prohibited from raising the issue of amendment for the first time on appeal. See Merkle v. Health Options, Inc., 940 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), review denied, 962 So. 2d 336 (Fla.2007). I respectfully dissent because I believe the majority has blurred the distinction between two issues — -the failure to plead a factually sufficient claim (which was neither argued by the parties nor decided by the trial court), and wheth…
• Canom Khadaya Williams v. State, 45 So. 3d 14 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …ounds that Appellant’s claim was not a “sentencing error” that could be raised in a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, and even if it was properly raised, the claim was without merit based upon Harris v. State, 932 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), rev. denied, 962 So. 2d 336 (Fla.2007). Appellant presents this same argument on appeal, and he also argues for the first time that section 893.101 and his convictions violate due process for the same reasons that his sentences are unconstitutional. [*16] Even if Appellant’s c…

  ← 1 / 2 →