STATE EX REL. PAGE
v.
HOLLINGSWORTH

Fla. | 1934-07-27
115 Fla. 851 Florida Supreme Court (1934) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 156 So. 286
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
Brown, Buford, Terrell, Whitfield

Per Curiam.

Motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus is overruled on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 103 Fla. 801, 138 Sou. 372, and State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 108 Fla. 607, 146 Sou. 660. The Respondents are allowed fifteen days from the date of filing of this Order in which to file return or answer. Respondents failing to file return or answer as herein directed, peremptory writ shall issue. It is so ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • White v. Pepsico, Inc., 568 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 1990)
    …that wherein the cause of action arose.” 20 Am.Jur.2d Courts § 123 (1965) (footnotes omitted). Cf. Hagen v. Viney, 124 Fla. 747, 169 So. 391 (1936) (action for specific performance of separation agreement); Wilson Cypress Co. v. Logan, 115 Fla. 845, 156 So. 286 (1934) (trover and conversion); Hodges v. Hunter Co., 61 Fla. 280, 54 So. 811 (1911) (trover and conversion); Confederation of Canada Life Ins. Co. v. Vega Y Arminan, 135 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961) (suit for cash proceeds on insurance policy), ce…
  • State v. Wm. M. Rowlett, 125 Fla. 562 (Fla. 1936)
    …t in the following cases, writs of mandamus against the Respondent Board have been sustained: State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 103 Fla. 801, 138 So. 372; Idem, 108 Fla. 607, 146 So. 660; State, ex rel. Page, v. Hollingsworth, 115 Fla. 851, 156 So. 286; Idem, 117 Fla. 288, 157 So. 887. So that -we hold that in cases where the Respondent Board is acting without jurisdiction or is exceeding its jurisdiction in not proceeding in accordance with the essential requirements of law, those common law proc…
  • State of Fla. ex rel. Barbara Greenberg v. The Fla. State Bd. OF Dentistry, 297 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
    …s commands, and that in the following cases, writs of mandamus against the respondent board have been sustained: State ex rel. Tullidge v. Hollingsworth, 103 Fla. 801, 138 So. 372; Id., 108 Fla. 607, 146 So. 660; State ex rel. Page v. Hollingsworth, 115 Fla. 851, 156 So. 286; Id., 117 Fla. 288, 157 So. 887. So that we hold that in cases where the respondent board is acting without jurisdiction or is exceeding its jurisdiction in not proceeding in accordance with the essential requirements of law, those comm…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw