LESCHER
v.
FLORIDA DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES

Fla. | 2007-02-09
No. SC07-32
949 So. 2d 198 Florida Supreme Court (2007) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 949 So.2d 198 · 2007 WL 708907
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court

v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES. No. SC07-32.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 9, 2007.

Decision without published opinion. Rev. granted.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ex post facto laws as to persons who could have applied for a hardship license before the amendment became effective? Id. We have jurisdiction and granted review. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const; Lescher v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Veh’ls, 949 So. 2d 198 (Fla.2007) (granting review). II. CIVIL PENALTY OR CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT? Both the United States and Florida Constitutions prohibit ex post facto laws. See U.S. Const. art. I, § 10; art. I, § 10, Fla. Const. The United States Supreme Court has defin…
  • Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Johnson, 980 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
    …la. 1st DCA 2003); see also Lescher v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 946 So. 2d 1140, 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“The legislature then adopted the provision as an amendment to section 322.271(4), effective July 1, 2003.”), review granted, 949 So. 2d 198 (Fla.2007). Hence, we must determine whether the Legisla [*1120] ture’s subsequent reenactment of chapter 98-223, which included the amended version of section 322.271(4), cured the single subject rule violation. In making this determination, we und…
  • M.A. Hajianpour, M.D., P.A. v. Khosrow Maleki, P.A., 975 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
    …urt reversed on appeal finding that Maleki’s damage calculations were purely speculative and ordered that judgment be granted in favor of Hajianpour. M.A. Hajianpour, M.D., P.A. v. Kkosrow Maleki, P.A., 932 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) rev. denied 949 So. 2d 198 (Fla.2007) (Maleki II). Hajianpour then moved for prevailing party attorney’s fees. He asserted that he was the prevailing party because Maleki II found that he had owed no financial obligation to Maleki. The trial court denied the motion, holding…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw