SMITH

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Caylor v. State, 78 So. 3d 482 (Fla. 2011)
  …ct courts of appeal. See Rosa v. State, 58 So. 3d 900 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2011); Lewis v. State, 34 So. 3d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), review granted, 53 So. 3d 230 (Fla.2011); Sturdivant v. State,So. 3d-, 2010 WL 3464410 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), review granted, 47 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. 2010). However, for the reasons discussed herein we find that the facts of the instant [*492] case are distinguishable from Brooks. Therefore, we do not need to address the scope or validity of Brooks here. . Following Caylor's conviction for…
• T.M.H. v. D.M.T., 79 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
  …r "ova.” . We are bound by this prior panel decision from our court until it is “overruled either by this court, sitting en banc, or a higher court.” Sturdivant v. State, - So. 3d -, 2010 WL 3464410 (Fla. 1st DCA) (citations omitted), rev. granted, 47 So. 3d 1290 (Fla.2010) (Table); see also In re Rule 9.331, 416 So. 2d 1127, 1128 (Fla.1982). . As the majority notes, when Appellant donated an egg for fertilization and implantation into Appellee, she signed a consent form acknowledging that she would have no…
• City OF W. Palm Beach v. McCRAY, 91 So. 3d 165 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  ….” Greenberg v. Schindler Elevator Corp., 47 So. 3d 901, 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). A trial court’s ruling on a motion for a new trial is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See Philippon v. Shreffler, 33 So. 3d 704, 709 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 47 So. 3d 1290 (Fla.2010). A prima facie case of employment discrimination may be established by either: direct evidence of discriminatory intent; statistical analysis showing a pattern of discrimination; or circumstantial evidence meeting the test established in…