FWG

v.

FLORIDA DEPT. OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Citator

Cited By

• Brazil v. David, 985 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Desroses v. McNeil, 980 So. 2d 488 (Fla.2008).…
• Banc OF Am. Inv. Servs., Inc. v. Barnett, 997 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
  …he standard of review on a petition for writ of certiorari is a departure from the essential requirements of law that adequately cannot be remedied on appeal. See Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Doe, 964 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), cert. denied, 980 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 2008). The court below departed from the essential requirements of law when it ordered production of documents concerning transactions in Mr. Day’s account that are privileged pursuant to section 655.059(2)(b), resulting in a harmful invasion…
• Andreas Keck v. Ashleigh K. Eminisor, 46 So. 3d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …non-final order does not end with rule 9.130 because the court has [*1073] jurisdiction to review certain non-final orders by certiorari); see also Brown v. McKinnon, 964 So. 2d 173, 174-76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (Shepherd, J., dissenting), rev. denied, 980 So. 2d 488 (Fla.2008); Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(1). I do not read the Stephens case relied upon by the majority to stand for the proposition that certiorari is not available in appropriate circumstances to review orders denying claims of immunity under section…