MORA

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Ponton v. Warden John Willis, 172 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …ion and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. See Ponton v. State, 153 So. 3d 908 (Fla.2014) (dismissing petition for writ of mandamus); Ponton v. Crews, 116 So. 3d 1262 (Fla.2013) (dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus); Ponton v. State, 881 So. 2d 1113 (Fla.2004) (dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus); Ponton v. Moore, 829 So. 2d 919 (Fla.2002) (dismissing petition for writ of mandamus); Ponton v. State, 147 So. 3d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (denying petition for belated appeal); Ponton v. S…
• Braudaway v. State, 890 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
  …designation as a sexual predator, arguing that the Florida Sexual Predator’s Act1 (“the Act”) is unconstitutional. In support of his argument, Braudaway cites Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted by Milks v. State, 881 So. 2d 1113 (Fla.2004). However, this court has addressed this issue in Milks v. State, 848 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So. 2d 514 (Fla.2003), concluding that the Act is constitutional. Accordingly, we affirm and certify conflict with Espin…
• Sage v. State, 890 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …l Predator Act is unconstitutional and violates his procedural due process rights. For support, he relies upon the opinion of the Third District Court in Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted sub nom. Milks v. State, 881 So. 2d 1113 (Fla.2004), which held that the Florida Sexual Predator Act is unconstitutional as it violates procedural due process. However, contrary to Sage’s position and Espindola, this court has held that the Florida Sexual Predator Act is constitutional an…