D.,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL.,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
K.D., a parent in a child welfare case, appealed a lower court decision regarding the Department of Children and Families and the Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office. The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in this dependency matter involving three children.
The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's decision without providing detailed analysis or reasoning in this per curiam affirmance.
“Affirmed.”
The entire holding of this per curiam opinion, affirming the lower court's decision without detailed reasoning.
This case involved three children, C.R., R.R., and D.R., and the appellate review of a circuit court decision in Pinellas County regarding their welfa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of C.R., R.R., and D.R., children. K.D., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM OFFICE, Appellees. No. 2D2025-3017 March 25, 2026 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Patrice Moore, Judge. Michelle Bui, Tampa, for Appellant. Bruce Bartlett, State Attorney, and Leslie M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee, Department of Children and Families. Jamie Billotte Moses of MMPO Defense, Orlando; and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Appellee Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and BLACK, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.