DAVID GARRISON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; RANDY SIRVEL HOWARD, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Court Reporter Duties cases and more on FLexlaw
In each of these appeals, the Public Defender’s Office of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit has filed a Motion to Compel against Lari Ash, court reporter, seeking the production and submission of delinquent transcripts within 15 days. After issuing several show cause orders, and after a hearing on October 2, 1990, at which Lari Ash appeared, no good cause has been shown why sanctions should not be imposed because of her failure to perform her court reporter duties in accordance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See State v. Florius, 536 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). It is therefore
ORDERED that Lari Ash shall pay a fine of $250.00 to the clerk of this court within thirty days of the date of this order as sanctions for her dereliction in her court reporter duties in the Garrison case. In addition, she shall pay costs of $35.00 to the clerk of this court within thirty days of the date of this order representing the cost of having the show cause hearing reported. Finally, Lari Ash shall pay a fine of $25.00 per day to the clerk of this court for each day after October 2, 1990, if any, that she did not or does not file with the clerk’s office of the trial court the complete record in the above cases according to the designations previously filed.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Williams v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 568 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…endency in Castellanos v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 545 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Also, it cannot be salvaged by reference to a previous order as was the case in Hardy v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 568 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). There is nothing in the instant record to compare with the factual findings in Hardy’s adjudicatory order. We do admit that some legislative dictates requiring specific findings by a court can be overdone and are burdensome, bu…
-
In the Interest of M.F.G. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 723 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…safety were in jeopardy. In order to adjudicate the daughter dependent, the department had to prove neglect by a preponderance of the evidence.2 [*293] See § 39.408(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997); Hardy v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., 568 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). It succeeded in this endeavor. See Hardy v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., 568 So. 2d at 1316. In sum, the trial court properly protected the interests of the children under these circumstances. Although we sympathi…
-
Clock v. Vikki Clock, 649 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…hat the petition for dependency should therefore have been dismissed. We agree. A dependent child is one who has been abandoned, abused, or neglected by his parents or custodians. Sec. 39.01(10)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); Hardy v. Department of H.R.S., 568 So. 2d 1314, 1316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Based upon the conclusions in support of the order of dependency, the trial court obviously deemed Clock’s planned relocation to Colorado with J.C. to be an act of abuse. The statutory definition of abuse is set out in se…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Charlemond Florius, 536 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)