D. D.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Circuit Court decision was affirmed.
[1] A per curiam affirmation without written explanation indicates appellate agreement that no reversible error occurred in the lower court's decision.
[2] An appeal from a circuit court judgment may be affirmed when the appellate court finds the trial court's decision was legally sound and procedurally proper.
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe specific facts of the case are not stated in the opinion text provided. The case involves a juvenile appellant, D.D., and the State of Florida as …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. 6D2024-1979 Lower Tribunal No. 2023-249-J
D.D., Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County. Peter A. Bell, Judge.
March 31, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and WHITE, JJ., concur. Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Maura J. Kiefer, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William A. Leto, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED