TIGE THOMPSON
v.
CITY OF MARCO ISLAND
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's decision in favor of the City of Marco Island was affirmed.
[1] A circuit court judgment may be affirmed without written explanation on appeal when the appellate court determines the lower court's decision is legally and factually sou…
[2] Per curiam affirmances without accompanying opinions are final judgments that conclude the appellate review process, subject only to the filing of a timely motion for reh…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTige Thompson initiated a legal action against the City of Marco Island in the Circuit Court for Collier County. The circuit court, presided over by J…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2024-2766 Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-001996
TIGE THOMPSON, Appellant,
v. CITY OF MARCO ISLAND, Appellee.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County. Lauren L. Brodie, Judge.
March 31, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WOZNIAK, WHITE and PRATT, JJ., concur. Luis M. Fuste, of Fuste Law P.A., Coral Gables, for Appellant.
Blayne Yudis and Edward G. Guedes, of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L, Coral Gables, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED