M.P.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
M.P., a father, appealed from a dependency judgment entered by the circuit court regarding his child. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in this family law matter involving the Department of Children and Families.
The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment in its entirety.
“Affirmed.”
The court's complete disposition affirming the lower court judgment without detailed written explanation in this per curiam opinion
This case involves a dependency proceeding in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County. The case number L.T. Case No. 312025DP000023A indi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Termination Of Parental Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
M.P., the Father, Appellant,
V.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM, Appellees.
No. 4D2025-3047
[April 2, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Rebecca Ivy White, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312025DP000023A. Roger Ally of Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Andrew Allen Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KLINGENSMITH, SHAW and LOTT, JJ., concur. * * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.