SEE HILLIER
v.
CITY OF PLANTATION

9th Cir. Ct. App. Div. | 2009-08-25
No. 2008-CV-32
1 FLCA 1288 Ninth Judicial Circuit Court, Appellate Division (2009)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Appellant Dignam appealed two traffic infractions for running red lights from a hearing officer's decision. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's findings, holding that credibility determinations are within the hearing officer's purview and cannot be challenged on appeal absent a hearing transcript.


Holding

The appellate court cannot review witness credibility determinations made by the hearing officer, and absent a transcript of the hearing testimony, the court must affirm the lower court's dispositions.


Headnotes

[1] An appellate court must affirm a lower court's findings when the appellant fails to provide a transcript of the hearing testimony.

[2] Determining the credibility of witnesses is the responsibility of the hearing officer or trial court, not the appellate court.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Since determining the credibility of witnesses is an issue for the hearing officer and not this appellate court, and since Appellant did not furnish this Court with a transcript of the hearing testimony, this Court must affirm the two dispositions appealed from.”

Establishes that credibility determinations are outside appellate review and lack of transcript mandates affirmance

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant Dignam was cited for running red lights on two occasions during one continuous driving event. The citations were tried together before a hea…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Before POWELL, BLACKWELL, J. ADAMS, J.J.

PER CURIAM.

FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING LOWER COURT

After a hearing by the hearing officer, Appellant Dignam was found guilty of two infractions of running a red light, adjudication was withheld, and a fine was imposed in each case. The citations were tried together since they were issued during one continuous driving event. Appellant did not provide a transcript of the hearing testimony. The sole issue on appeal is credibility of the witnesses, i.e. whose testimony did the hearing officer believe– that of the officer who issued the citations or that of Appellant. Since determining the credibility of witnesses is an issue for the hearing officer and not this appellate court, and since Appellant did not furnish this Court with a transcript of the hearing testimony, this Court must affirm the two dispositions appealed from. See Hillier v. City of Plantation, 935 So. 2d 105, 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)(citing Adkins v. State, 650 So. 2d 61, 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))(noting that it is for the trial court who heard the testimony below, not the appellate court, to evaluate and weigh the credibility of witness testimony); Hudson Pest Control, Inc. v. Westford Asset Mgmt., Inc., 622 So. 2d 546, 547 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)(where an appellant has not furnished a transcript, the appellate court must give utmost credence to trial court’s findings). The Court also dispenses with oral argument pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320.

AFFIRMED.

DONE and ORDERED at Orlando, Florida this __25___day of ____August_________,

2009.

_______/s/_____________________

ROM W. POWELL

Senior Judge

________/s/______________________

_________/s/___________________ ALICE L. BLACKWELL

JOHN H. ADAMS, Sr. Circuit Judge

Circuit Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing order was furnished via U.S. mail on this 25 day of August , 2009, to the following: Patrick Alfred Dignam, 1737 Watauga Avenue #101, Orlando, Florida 32812 and Office of the State Attorney, Appeals Unit, 415 N. Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801.

/s/

Judicial Assistant


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw