FLORIDA CERTIFIED SIGN ERECTORS, LLC
v.
KIEFFER & CO., INC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Certified Sign Erectors appealed a trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Kieffer and an award of attorney's fees to Kieffer in a breach of contract dispute over unpaid sign installation work. The appellate court affirmed the attorney's fees award but found the summary judgment appeal untimely and therefore outside its jurisdiction.
The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney's fees but found it lacked jurisdiction to review the summary judgment order because the appeal was untimely filed more than 30 days after the summary judgment order, which constituted a final order despite not being titled 'Final Judgment.'
[1] An order granting summary judgment is considered a final order for purposes of appeal, even if not explicitly titled 'Final Judgment,' if it clearly indicates the entry o…
[2] Appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review untimely filed appeals.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a trial court may enter summary judgment only when there are no issues of material fact conclusively shown from the record and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law”
Establishes the standard for summary judgment that the court applied to review the trial court's order
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFlorida Certified, a subcontractor, was hired by Kieffer to install a sign and filed suit against Kieffer and FelCor for breach of contract and constr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Foreclosure Of Construction Lien cases and more on FLexlaw
Before DOHERTY, SCHREIBER, and WHITE, J.J.
PER CURIAM.
FINAL ORDER AND OPINION AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT’S FINAL JUDGMENT
Appellant, Florida Certified Sign Erectors, LLC (“Florida Certified”), a subcontractor hired by Kieffer & Co., Inc. (“Kieffer”), brought an action to recover unpaid monies allegedly owed by Kieffer for the installation of a sign. Florida Certified filed an appeal of the trial court’s “Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” in favor of Kieffer rendered on October 4, 2011 and “Final Judgment Awarding Attorney’s Fees,” awarding Kieffer attorney’s fees, rendered February 1, 2012. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 26.012(1), Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(c)(1)(A).
On May 24, 2010, Florida Certified filed its Complaint, alleging breach of contract and construction lien foreclosure against Kieffer and FelCor Hotel Asset Company, LLC (“FelCor”).
On December 15, 2010, the trial court dismissed the construction lien foreclosure count, as well as Florida Certified’s Complaint as to FelCor only.
On June 27, 2011, Kieffer filed a motion for summary judgment, claiming that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Florida Certified had effectuated an accord and satisfaction when it deposited the check from Kieffer; additionally in that motion, Kieffer requested reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
On October 4, 2011, the trial court granted Kieffer’s motion and entered an order of summary judgment for Kieffer, and on February 1, 2012, the trial court entered the Final Judgment Awarding Attorney’s Fees, awarding Kieffer a total $16,040.87 for both attorney’s fees and costs.
Florida Certified raises two issues on appeal: 1) whether the trial court erred in granting Kieffer’s motion for summary judgment; and 2) whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Kieffer. The standard of review for reviewing the grant of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, as “[a] trial court may enter summary judgment only when there are no issues of material fact conclusively shown from the record and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Shaw v. Tampa Elec. Co., 949 So. 2d 1066, 1069 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (quoting Reeves v.
N. Broward Hosp. Dist., 821 So. 2d 319, 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)).
As to the issue of attorney’s fees, “[t]he standard of review for an award of prevailing party attorney fees is an abuse of discretion.” Shands Teaching Hosp. and Clinics, Inc. v. Mercury Ins. Co. of Florida, 97 So. 3d 204, 213 (Fla. 2012).
Kieffer argues that the appeal of the summary judgment order is not timely filed because the appeal was filed more than 30 days after the rendition of the trial court’s Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment. Florida Certified argues that the summary judgment order is not a final order because the title does not state that it is final while the attorney’s fees orders states that it is a final judgment which indicates the Court’s intention that it be consider the final order from which appeal deadlines should run. Although the trial court’s summary judgment order is not titled “Final Judgment,” the order states “The Motion is granted, and summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Kieffer & Co and against Plaintiff Florida Certified Sign Erectors, LLC.” (Emphasis added).
This language is sufficient to establish finality. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Open MRI of Orlando, Inc., 780 So. 2d 339, 340-341 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
The Court finds that the Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment is a final order and the appeal of that order is untimely.
Accordingly, this Court does not have jurisdiction to review that order. As to this issue of whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Kieffer, this Court affirms the trial court’s Final Judgment Awarding Attorney’s Fees.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the trial court’s Final Judgment Awarding Attorney’s Fees is AFFIRMED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Orlando, Orange County, Florida, this 24th day March , 2014.
/S/
PATRICIA A. DOHERTY Presiding Circuit Judge
SCHREIBER and WHITE, J.J., concur. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Order has been furnished via U.S. mail to Russell N. Parrish, Esq., Farmer, Price, Hornsby & Weatherford, L.L.P., Post Office Drawer 2228, Dothan, Alabama 36302; and Michael A. Tessitore, Esq., McClane Partners, 215 East Livingston Street, Orlando, Florida 32801, on the 24th day of March, 2014.
/S/
Judicial Assistant
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Reeves v. N. Broward Hosp. Dist., 821 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Shands Teaching Hosp. & Clinics, Inc. v. Mercury Ins. Co. OF Fla., 97 So. 3d 204 (Fla. 2012)
- Shaw v. Tampa Elec. Co., 949 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Open MRI OF Orlando, Inc., 780 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)