YONG-SON KIM (F/K/A: YONG-SON BRADSHAW), APPELLANT,
v.
RUSSELL LEE BRADSHAW, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the absence of findings of fact supporting the trial court's alimony and property division awards prevents meaningful appellate review.
Wife appealed a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, arguing the trial court erred in awarding rehabilitative alimony instead of permanent perio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Equitable Distribution Of Property cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage arguing that the trial court erred by (1) awarding rehabilitative alimony instead of permanent periodic alimony and (2) by inequitably distributing property in violation of Chapter 61, Florida Statutes. The absence of any findings of fact to support the trial court’s rehabilitative alimony award and property division preclude any meaningful review by this court.
The final judgment is REVERSED and REMANDED to the trial court for issuance of an amended final judgment containing adequate findings of fact to support the judgment.1 See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Raehn v. Raehn, 557 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Calhoun v. Calhoun, 554 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Haas v. Haas, 552 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Strickler v. Strickler, 548 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Clemson v. Clemson, 546 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Lee v. Lee, 544 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
WIGGINTON, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur. . The trial court may take additional evidence if necessary to comply with this court's opinion. This court’s recent opinion in Thomas v. Thomas, 571 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), may be of some guidance to the trial court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bryant v. State, 577 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…ion, you will have drug screening, and if required, that you have counseling and random urinalysis. Since the written order of probation does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of conditions, reversal is required. Gardner v. State, 569 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Because the special condition of probation as announced by the trial court at sentencing does not provide for “treatment as directed by the probation officer,” as in the written order, we do not reach the issue of the trial cour…
-
Dantler v. State, 584 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…onditions of probation violated. A trial court’s formal written order finding the probationer in violation of the terms and conditions of probation must conform to the oral pronouncements at the revocation hearing and sentencing. Gardner v. State, 569 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Earle v. State, 519 So. 2d 757, 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Haynes v. State, 571 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Morris v. [*199] State, 563 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Donley v. State, 557 So. 2d 943, 945 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). A…
-
Clance v. Clance, 576 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…t for issuance of an amended final judgment containing adequate findings of fact to support the award of rehabilitative alimony, or a ruling otherwise as to the awards of rehabilitative alimony and/or permanent periodic alimony. See Kim v. Bradshaw, 569 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions. WOLF, J., concurs. BARFIELD, J., concurs and dissents with opinion.…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Haas v. Haas, 552 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- Clemson v. Cathleen Carol Clemson, 546 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- LEE v. LEE, 544 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
- Thomas v. Randell D. Thomas, 571 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Verena Strickler v. Strickler, 548 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
- Calhoun v. Calhoun, 554 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
- Raehn v. Raehn, 557 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Spleen v. Rogers Grp., Inc., 548 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)