CAROL J. MASEGIAN, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
HOTELRAMA ASSOCIATES, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-10-23
No. 89-290
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
569 So. 2d 811 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 349 So. 2d 1187 (Fla.1977); Grossman v. Sea Air Towers, Limited, 513 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So. 2d 584 (Fla.1988); Hirsch v. Mount Sinai Medical Center, Inc., 458 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Jimenez v. Gulf & Western Mfg. Co., 458 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Valladares v. Junco-Valladares, 30 So. 3d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
    …d that “if the increased value [in an asset] was the result of either the work efforts of one or both spouses or the expenditure of marital funds or earnings of the parties” such a portion of the increase in value is a marital asset. Graff v. Graff, 569 So. 2d 811, 812 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). See also Stevens v. Stevens, 651 So. 2d 1306, 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Young v. Young, 606 So. 2d 1267, 1270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Massis v. Massis, 551 So. 2d 587, 589 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The trial court considered the f…
  • Young v. Young, 606 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …o distribute equitably the appreciated value of the marital home caused by inflation, market conditions, or improvements made on a residence during the marriage, even though the home may itself be the separate property of one spouse. Graff v. Graff, 569 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), review denied, 581 So. 2d 1308 (Fla.1991); Massis v. Massis, 551 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Crapps v. Crapps, 501 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 511 So. 2d 297 (Fla.1987). Accordingly, we conclude that the trial…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw