RODOLFO CASTELLON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

15th Cir. Ct. App. Div. | 2020-07-15
No. 19AP112
1 FLCA 6913 Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Appellate Division (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Rodolfo Castellon appealed his conviction and sentence for Battery (Domestic), challenging the trial court's evidentiary ruling and conviction. The appellate court affirmed the evidentiary ruling but reversed the conviction on the grounds that Battery (Domestic) is not a valid crime under Florida law, remanding for correction to reflect a Battery conviction instead.


Holding

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in precluding impeachment, but the conviction for Battery (Domestic) was improper because Battery (Domestic) is not a valid crime under Florida law. The case is remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence to reflect a conviction for Battery.


Headnotes

[1] A conviction for "Battery (Domestic)" is improper in Florida, as no such distinct crime exists.

[2] A judgment and sentence must be corrected to reflect a conviction for "Battery" when the charge was improperly labeled "Battery (Domestic)".

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“we hold that the trial court erred in convicting Appellant of Battery (Domestic), as there is no such crime in the State of Florida”

Establishes the core holding that Battery (Domestic) is not a valid criminal offense under Florida law

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Castellon was convicted of Battery (Domestic) in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. At trial, Castellon attempted to impeach the victim with alle…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

421 Third Street, 6th Floor

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 [email protected] [email protected]

For Appellee: Joseph R. Kadis, Esq. Office of the State Attorney

401 North Dixie Highway

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

[email protected]

[email protected]

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Rodolfo Castellon, appeals his judgment and sentence for one count of Battery (Domestic). Appellant asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in precluding him from impeaching the victim with alleged material omissions from her statement to police, and that the trial court erred in convicting him of Battery (Domestic). As to Appellant’s first argument, we affirm without comment. However, as to Appellant’s second argument, we hold that the trial court erred in convicting Appellant of Battery (Domestic), as there is no such crime in the State of Florida. Crockett v. State, 91 So. 3d 872, 872 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Narinesingh v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 230a (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. Apr. 22, 2019). Accordingly, we REMAND to the trial court to correct Appellant’s judgment and sentence to properly reflect that he was convicted and sentenced to Battery, and not Battery (Domestic). We otherwise AFFIRM in all other aspects.

G. KEYSER, GILLEN, and CARACUZZO, JJ., concur. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

APPELLATE DIVISION (CRIMINAL): AC

CASE NO.: 502019AP000112AXXXMB

L.T. NO.: 502019MM001907AXXXMB

RODOLFO CASTELLON,

Appellant,

Opinion/Decision filed: July 15, 2020

v. Appeal from the County Court in and for

Palm Beach County, Florida; STATE OF FLORIDA,

Judge Debra Moses Stephens

Appellee.

Appealed: July 29, 2019 _________________________/

DATE OF PANEL: JULY 14, 2020

PANEL JUDGES: G. KEYSER, GILLEN, CARACUZZO

AFFIRMED/REVERSED/OTHER: AFFIRM AND REMAND W/ INSTRUCTIONS

DECISION BY: PER CURIAM

CONCURRING: ) DISSENTING: ) CONCURRING SPECIALLY: )

) With/Without Opinion ) With/Without Opinion )

) ) ) /s/ Gregory M. Keyser ) _____________________ ) _________________________ ) DATE: 7/14/20 J. ) J. ) J. )

)

)

) /s/ Jeffrey Dana Gillen ) _____________________ ) _________________________ ) DATE: 7/14/20 J. ) J. ) J. )

)

)

) /s/ Cheryl A. Caracuzzo ) _____________________ ) _________________________ ) DATE: 7/14/20 J. ) J. ) J. )


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw