GITA ROMANO, APPELLANT,
v.
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-11-06
No. 90-1366
Before FERGUSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
569 So. 2d 842 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Gita Romano, the insured, appeals an adverse final summary judgment entered in favor of her insurer, Travelers Insurance Company. Under the peculiar circumstances present here, we conclude that the insured’s underinsured motorist claim had in essence become moot during the pendency of the proceedings below. In affirming, we do not condone Travelers’ handling of the claim.

Affirmed.*

*

Travelers initially took the position below that for purposes of underinsured motorist coverage, its insured was bound by the amount of the judgment its insured had obtained against the tortfeasor (less the amount of the tortfeasor’s insurance), while simultaneously saying that Travelers was not bound by the same judgment and could relitigate the amount of its own insured’s injury. We see no indication that the rule in United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Warmack, 386 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), review denied, 392 So. 2d 1381 (Fla.1981), was intended to be applied in a one-sided manner by an insurer against its own insured.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw