JAMES L. MARTIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1990-11-09
No. 89-2997
SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
569 So. 2d 882 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See, Wilkerson v. State, 556 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. den., 564 So. 2d 1088 (Fla.1990).

SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Walker v. State, 619 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
    …e function of the Department of Corrections. The state emphasizes Green’s holding that the award of gain time is a DOC function, but Walker counters that credit for previously-earned gain time has been denominated a judicial function, Cole v. State, 569 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The award of gain time is solely a function of the Department of Corrections. Green; Shelby v. State, 554 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). In the Green line of cases, the defendants had completed the incarcer-ative portions of spli…
  • Schebel v. State, 721 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
    …with the result that his youthful offender sentence exceeded the six-year statutory maximum, then appellant’s sentence would likewise be illegal and he would be entitled to relief under rule 3.800(a). See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1989); Cole v. State, 569 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (on reconsideration) (in resentencing youthful offender after revocation of probation or community control, court must provide credit for time actually served and gain time already allotted by the Department of Corrections during…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw