MICHAEL SCARLETT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL SCARLETT, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
569 So. 2d 1315
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Williams v. State, 568 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Arnold v. State, 566 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); King v. State, 557 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 564 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. 1990). Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). See also Barber v. State, 564 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Leslie Sultan, D.D.S. v. Earing-Doud, 852 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…ggestion of irreparable harm, Dr. Sultan contends that he will be placed in a difficult position in cross-examining the witness at trial. Without discussing the certiorari standard at trial, the fifth district in Edwards v. Humana of Florida, Inc., 569 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), granted certio-rari review under similar circumstances. Edwards filed a medical negligence action against a hospital and physicians (respondents). She retained Dr. Kirsch, a neurosurgeon, to review her case and render an expert…
Authorities Cited
- Caracciolo v. State, 557 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Barber v. State, 564 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Arnold v. State, 566 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
- Williams v. State, 568 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)