DEAN S. WATERS, APPELLANT,
v.
VINCENT A. CRUDELE, APPELLEE; ACCENT REALTY OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., APPELLANT, V. VINCENT A. CRUDELE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Waters and Accent Realty appealed a bench trial judgment in a real estate dispute involving an agreement for deed and promissory note. The court affirmed the trial court's rulings on default, rent retention, and default interest, but reversed the trial court's outright cancellation of the promissory note, instead conditioning its cancellation on whether Accent Realty exercises its redemption right.
The court affirmed that Crudele was entitled to retain rents and that default interest was properly applied. The court affirmed that Crudele must deliver mortgage satisfactions. The court reversed the outright cancellation of the promissory note, holding instead that the note should be cancelled only if Accent Realty exercises its redemption right under the agreement for deed.
[1] A party in default on an agreement for deed is entitled to retain rents received after the default and is not obligated to account for them to the defaulting party.
[2] When an agreement for deed is in default, the trial court correctly applies the default interest rate specified in the agreement.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“subsequent to Dean Waters' default, appellee Vincent Crudele was entitled to retain the rents and is not obliged to account for same to appellants”
Establishes that upon borrower's default, the lender retains rents without accounting obligation.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDean Waters and Accent Realty entered into an agreement for deed with Vincent Crudele to purchase property. Crudele received a $100,000 down payment a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Default Interest Rate cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Accent Realty of Jacksonville, Inc. and Dean Waters appeal a final judgment after nonjury trial. With regard to Accent Realty’s appeal, we agree with the trial court first, that subsequent to Dean Waters’ default, appellee Vincent Crudele was entitled to retain the rents and is not obliged to account for same to appellants. Second, we likewise agree that since the agreement for deed was indisputably in default, the trial court correctly applied the default interest rate. Third, appellee concedes that, pursuant to the agreement for deed, he must deliver satisfactions of mortgage with respect to the mortgages presently on the property. That being so, the final judgment is affirmed with respect to the points raised by Accent Realty.
Turning to the separate appeal by Dean Waters, we note that when the trial court reserved jurisdiction “to determine the indebtedness to which Crudele was entitled under the agreement for deed,” that reservation necessarily included a determination as to the promissory note. Under the cancellation agreement, the promissory note was executed by Crudele as the mechanism to repay the $100,000 he had received as a down payment on the property under the agreement for deed. The parties’ agreement provided that the note would be void if the agreement for deed were not set aside. In setting the amount which Accent would have to pay in order to consummate the agreement for deed, the trial court necessarily had to determine the status of the note in order to compute the balance to be paid to Crudele. Indeed, the representations made by Dean Waters in the companion case pending below indicate that he understood this to be the case. Thus, we are unpersuaded by Waters’ argument on appeal that he was prejudiced when the trial court ruled on the status of the promissory note in its final judgment.
We do find, however, that the trial court went too far when it simply cancelled the promissory note. We agree that if Accent Realty exercises its redemption right under the agreement for deed then Crudele would not be obligated to repay the $200,000 down payment and the note must be cancelled. If, however, Accent Realty does not redeem, then there would be no reason in the present proceeding to cancel the promissory note, and the parties’ companion litigation below could proceed to adjudicate the parties’ claims and defenses with respect to the note. Therefore, we reverse the ruling that the promissory note is cancelled and remand with directions to amend the final judgment to provide that the promissory note will be cancelled if Accent Realty exercises its redemption right in accordance with the terms of the final judgment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Doolittle v. State, 679 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…lenges, we can no longer expect to see blatant statements being made of a desire to exclude females. Yet within the context of this record, this statement of the defense lawyer is certainly indicative of a gender-based motive. See Waters v. Crudele, 570 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). As to the particular juror in question, Ms. Bianchini, the reason given for the challenge was that “she stated she doesn’t see where hitting something was a solution for a problem.” While on its face the reason is certainly gend…