ULYSSES CRENSHAW, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We need not address the question whether admitting a 911 tape into evidence, where the victim identified the defendant as her assailant, was erroneous. The issue was not preserved for review by a specific contemporaneous objection. Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1978).
Because the trial court failed to enter written reasons in support of its departure sentence, the matter must be remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So. 2d 554 (Fla.1990).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied. The State’s motion to certify the question certified in Stennis v. State, 567 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), is granted. SHOULD POPE v. STATE BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY TO SENTENCES IMPOSED PRIOR TO APRIL 26, 1990?
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Magrans v. State, 584 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…ouncement on April 26, 1990. I would certify, as we have in the past, the following question as being of great public importance: SHOULD POPE V. STATE BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY TO SENTENCES IMPOSED PRIOR TO APRIL 26, 1990? See Crenshaw v. State, 570 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Fonseca v. State, 570 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); State v. Reliford, 568 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), review dismissed, 576 So. 2d 290 (Fla.1991); Stennis v. State, 567 So. 2d 1071 (Fla.3d DCA 1990); Perez v. State, 566 So.…
-
Rodriguez v. State, 623 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Delva, 575 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1991); Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1978); Crenshaw v. State, 570 So. 2d 349 [*1247] (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Perez v. State, 566 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).…
Authorities Cited
- Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1978)
- Pope v. State, 561 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 1990)
- Stennis v. State, 567 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)