LAVERNE HENDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LAVERNE HENDERSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
570 So. 2d 1150
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because of the variances between the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing and the provisions of the judgment and sentence and the order of probation, and because of the court’s express reliance on Heuring v. State, 539 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), we reverse and remand for resentencing in light of Heuring v. State, 559 So. 2d 207 (Fla.1990), and so that the court may remedy the inconsistencies between the sentencing pronouncements and documentation.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ERVIN, BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Bock, 659 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…ed where that order is at variance with the court’s oral pronouncement. Stevens v. State, 651 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Wright v. State, 600 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Henderson v. State, 570 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, when the State appealed the County Court’s order of dismissal to the Appellate Division of Circuit Court, the Circuit Court should have reversed the dismissal for the foregoing reasons; the failure to do so was a v…
Authorities Cited
- Heuring v. State, 559 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1990)
- Heuring v. State, 539 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)