LOUIS SANMARTIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1990-05-02
No. 90-00922
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
571 So. 2d 6 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s pro se petition for return of property, which we have treated as the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief. The trial court’s order is affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking relief after his direct appeal has been decided. See Marshall v. State, 481 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Davenport v. State, 751 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
    …PER CURIAM. Appeal DISMISSED. See Marshall v. State, 481 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Sanmartin v. State, 571 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Duenas v. State, 576 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). And see Fla. R.App. P. 9.600. ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, CONCUR.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw