CALVIN CARLOS CAMPBELL, PETITIONER,
v.
ROBERTA FULTON FOX, RESPONDENT
CALVIN CARLOS CAMPBELL, PETITIONER,
ROBERTA FULTON FOX, RESPONDENT
571 So. 2d 26
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Following review of respondent’s notice of compliance with writ, it is ordered that this Court’s opinion of July 17, 1990 is hereby withdrawn. The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby granted.
HUBBART, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
U.S. Sec. Ins. Co. v. Jeanni M. Cimino, 754 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 2000)…QUINCE, J. We have for review Cimino v. U.S. Security Insurance Co., 715 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), wherein the district court certified conflict with Klipper v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 571 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve the First District’s decision in Cimino, because we find that absent a valid reason for denial, an insured is entitled to have an attorney or videographer presen…1 / 2
-
U.S. Sec. Ins. Co. v. Floriselva Silva, 693 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…benefits should be paid. Thus, an unreasonable refusal of a claimant to submit to an examination alleviates the insurer of any further liability for PIP benefits. Id. at 1292 (emphasis added). Finally, in Klipper v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 571 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), the Second District Court of Appeal again spoke to this issue: The medical examination provided by 627.736(7), which arises from the contractual relationship between a consumer and the insurer of his choice, is designed to assis…
-
Jeanni M. Cimino v. U.S. Sec. Ins. Co., 715 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(B), the appellant challenges a nonfinal order by which a temporary injunction was dissolved. Because the trial court improperly relied upon Klipper v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 571 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 576 So. 2d 288 (Fla.1991), in concluding that the appellant was unlikely to prevail in her claimed right to have her attorney present with a video camera during a section 627.736(7), Florida Statutes, physical examin…