OMEGA DUPONT AND RAYMOND DUPONT, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the convictions of both appellants and most sentences, but reversed and remanded one sentence for a concealed firearm conviction due to exceeding the statutory maximum.
Appellants were convicted of armed robbery with a firearm, carrying a concealed firearm, and assault. Raymond Dupont received a sentence for carrying …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Maximum Penalty cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Omega Dupont and Raymond Dupont, appeal their convictions and sentences for armed robbery with a firearm, carrying concealed firearm, and assault. We affirm Omega Dupont’s convictions and sentence. We affirm Raymond Dupont’s convictions but reverse his sentence for carrying a concealed firearm and remand.
Appellants’ convictions arose from an armed robbery of a gas station. We find no merit in appellants’ contentions regarding their convictions, and affirm them without further discussion.
Appellant, Raymond Dupont, contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him to seventeen years for carrying a concealed firearm where the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is five years. Appel-lee, the State of Florida, concedes that Raymond Dupont must be resentenced on the carrying a concealed firearm conviction to a sentence within the statutory parameters.
Accordingly, we affirm appellants’ convictions. We affirm appellants’ sentences except we reverse Raymond Dupont’s sentence for carrying a concealed firearm and remand for resentencing within statutory parameters. See Rosa-Sanchez v. State, 561 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Sears v. State, 539 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); see also §§ 790.01, 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Sears v. State, 539 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Rosa-Sanchez v. State, 561 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)