JEFF HODGES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1932-06-03
105 Fla. 621 Florida Supreme Court (1932) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 142 So. 232
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the *622said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lewis v. Raleigh Travers Green, III, 389 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
    …; 80 Am.Jur.2d Wills, §§ 1408, 1409, 1415, 1434 (1975); 96 C.J.S. Wills, §§ 692, 695 (1952). Arnold v. Wells, 100 Fla. 1470, 131 So. 400 (1930); Dean v. Crews, 77 Fla. 319, 81 So. 479 (1919); Paul v. Frierson, 21 Fla. 529 (1885). . Reimer v. Smith, 105 Fla. 621, 142 So. 603 (1932), Simon, Redfearn Wills and Administration in Florida, § 13.09 (5th Ed. 1977); § 689.22 Fla.Stat. (1979). . 80 Am.Jur.2d Wills § 1207 (1975); Simon, Redfearn Wills and Administration in Florida, § 12.17 (5th Ed. 1977); 26A C.J.S.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw